| Which came first | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Naring Member
Posts : 114 Join date : 2008-07-08 Age : 32 Location : USA Pennsalyina
| Subject: Which came first Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:04 pm | |
| Which came first the chicken or the egg
post your awenser with a reason for your awenser
as well you can post weather you think the good or the evil came first on Azeroth | |
|
| |
Moderator Oaken Moderator
Posts : 224 Join date : 2008-06-25 Age : 30 Location : U.S.A.
| Subject: Re: Which came first Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:07 pm | |
| I honestly think evil came first.
Think about this:
When everyone was nice to eachother and just trying to survive you can't classify them as good or evil. Let's call them neutral. So after a while someone stole from someone else, creating an act of evil. After that act of evil occured the neutral people became good because they were the opposite of the evil one. | |
|
| |
Naring Member
Posts : 114 Join date : 2008-07-08 Age : 32 Location : USA Pennsalyina
| Subject: Re: Which came first Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:13 pm | |
| Hmm alright but that still doesnt explain which came first the chicken or the egg | |
|
| |
Moderator Oaken Moderator
Posts : 224 Join date : 2008-06-25 Age : 30 Location : U.S.A.
| Subject: Re: Which came first Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:13 pm | |
| It's self explanitory...
Chickens are evil. Eggs are not. | |
|
| |
Naring Member
Posts : 114 Join date : 2008-07-08 Age : 32 Location : USA Pennsalyina
| Subject: Re: Which came first Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:20 pm | |
| So true ..hmmm but which is better good or evil....because if evil came firest does that mean good is an improvemt on evil or is it that good i a down graded verson of evil ?/ | |
|
| |
Moderator Oaken Moderator
Posts : 224 Join date : 2008-06-25 Age : 30 Location : U.S.A.
| Subject: Re: Which came first Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:23 pm | |
| One is not an upgrade or downgrade of the other. Think of a magnet. There is a north pole and a south pole of it. Each pole is the opposite of the other but no pole is better. | |
|
| |
Naring Member
Posts : 114 Join date : 2008-07-08 Age : 32 Location : USA Pennsalyina
| Subject: Re: Which came first Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:27 pm | |
| well if there both equal then wouldnt they been created at the same to becase there is a need of balnce??? | |
|
| |
Moderator Oaken Moderator
Posts : 224 Join date : 2008-06-25 Age : 30 Location : U.S.A.
| Subject: Re: Which came first Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:30 pm | |
| No, they aren't physical things. They don't need to be made at the same time to be equal. Think of people favoring coke and people favoring pepsi. We can safely say that the number of people that favor coke is roughly the same as the number that favor pepsi. Therefore, since it is just an opinion, they are equal.
There is, however, a needed balance between good and evil. If evil does not exsist then good cannot exsist. | |
|
| |
Naring Member
Posts : 114 Join date : 2008-07-08 Age : 32 Location : USA Pennsalyina
| Subject: Re: Which came first Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:33 pm | |
| cant aruge with that logic...hmm i wonder i should open up an new thread called your favoite foods...and then other one called the Doctor Naring advice ....hmm | |
|
| |
Meranim Member
Posts : 129 Join date : 2008-06-15 Age : 33 Location : belgium
| Subject: Re: Which came first Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:19 am | |
| none was first because nobody thinks of himself that he's evil and that he does something wrong xD | |
|
| |
Naring Member
Posts : 114 Join date : 2008-07-08 Age : 32 Location : USA Pennsalyina
| Subject: Re: Which came first Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:27 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Moderator Oaken Moderator
Posts : 224 Join date : 2008-06-25 Age : 30 Location : U.S.A.
| Subject: Re: Which came first Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:45 pm | |
| But it can still be defined as an act of evil. If someone kills another person for no reason would you say it's not evil or good? That it's neutral? No. It would be considered evil in this society. The idea that "There is no evil because people don't think they're evil." exsists only in the evil person's mind. To everyone else it's evil. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Which came first | |
| |
|
| |
| Which came first | |
|